Marx Toy Trains
"How to Solve From Poverty to Nuclear War" – Democrism – Third Theory
How To Solve From Poverty to the War nuclear "- (Democrism – Third Theory)-Part 1
DEMOCRISM – THE THEORY OF THIRD
For Viswanathan Prof
Director,
International Socio-Economic Research Bureau, India (economist@dataone.in)
Introduction
1. The feature of this book is to display the implicit meaning of "Democratisation of the Economy" and its impacts arising that are dominant and interfere in all economic activities such as determining the volume of employment, output, consumption volume, volume investment, fair pricing and so on.
2. In itself the term "Democratization of Economy" is manifested in essence, the judicial way of "capital distribution to the people, the creation of investment for the people and state of the economy by the people "
3. Indeed, in its true sense, the democratization of the economy prevents and prohibits all effective measures and commitments and assets initiation of a few individuals or moderately some people like capitalism or the state as in socialism, in the creation and administration of capital in any parameter. In short, the capitalists, the socialists will disappear in the execution of any nation's economic activity as soon as the democratization of the economy emerges universal acceptance of people for the sake of economic justice. In other words, people, only the people, nothing more than people would be entitled to exercise all the economic powers.
4. The "democratization" of the economy should not be placed in identical terms with the ideologies of capitalism or socialism in any point of view. It is isolated from existing economic systems that have plunged into chaos and confusion in solving problems economic performance since the Industrial Revolution.
5. The term "democratization of the economy", I mean economically government of the people, by the people and for the people. So we can conveniently and convincingly translated as "Economic Democracy." By contrast, political democracy "Now practically means" political rule of the majority, by the majority and the majority. "The mechanism of choice and the system have replaced party "all persons" to "most people." But not now our concern to discuss.
6. From now on I would like to introduce a new terminology "Democrism" in place of the "democratization of the economy." "Democrism" is an economic system, "Democracy" is political. Intrinsically 'Democrism' is based on the concept of economic justice "That must take ownership of capital", but "democracy" in the vote bank of people.
7. Almost is the ownership of capital "That determines what kind of economic system a country below.
If capital is owned by a few individuals we named capitalism. Moreover, if it is state-owned capital they call "socialism." And if the capital is held at the same time both by a few individuals and the state will declare it as "economy mixed. "
In the equation above concepts, I justify the term "Democrism" if the capital is directly owned by all people in whole.
Once the seed of "Direct ownership of capital by the people" is planted in the theory and practice of the following fair and equitable consequences germinate with deep roots in the socio-economic floor.
I. Distribution of Capital
The accumulated stock of domestic capital used in production of goods and services are distributed equally to all people working automatically. This distribution capital just a book-keeping work. Nobody can hand capital goods. The purpose is served in the equal distribution of capital is to make people realizes that the owners are justified from all industries as a whole.
II. Classless society:
In the distribution Democrism fair capital, discrimination based on class of "capitalists and workers" and "employers and employees will automatically disappear. In the acquisition of part of the capital to all the workers will become all the capitalists and the capitalists will become workers. There are two methods to establish classless society. One of them is negative approach and the positive. Karl Marx is calling for the negative attitude of establishing a classless society by abolishing of "property right" for everyone. democrism theory following positive approach to ensure an equal distribution of wealth throughout the capital for the company to establish classless. The ownership of capital wealth to all workers given inalienable economic power, economic security and economic equality in which can be protected from exploitation and lead to an ideal society.
III. Creation of investment in terms of wages:
In the same plane as the distribution of capital to the people, the creation of new investment in economic development will be borne by the people in the well-defined and universally accepted principle. Since the beginning should be based on economic justice and investment is also a creation of the labor force to the basic principle economic development of all economic systems' work according to energy and wages according to work "should not be frozen and become stop to that concept. Be developed further in investment according to the wages of respect and recognize the labor courts. In order to safeguard the integrity optimal work theory well-established desire to put a step forward in the following manner:
"The work according to energy
the Energy wages according to work
investment in terms of wages "
For the creation of National Investment, each worker contribute a certain portion of their earnings. In other words, each worker will contribute a share of investment according to your salary. For example, if a company is issuing securities issued by 100 million Ra. 1 each just for the value, all shares will be distributed only to workers in the country according to their salary. This process kept permanently increasing that share were issued. No individual will be allowed to scam as many shares as you can buy with their money power.
IV. Free of the economy of Interest:
In the current situation of the economy of the compounds necessary investment schemes is that it derives from savings (deposits). The investment required in a given time in the pool of savings is not always a good process to ensure balance between the "savings and investment ". The conversion of savings into investment, inevitably requires a large payment of interest to achieve and establish an appropriate process balance between them. (Note: the marginal efficiency of capital ie, profit is another critical factor in determining the volume of investment required
V. industrial fraternity:
In the creation of direct investment by the workers according to their industrial wage of brotherhood "each for all industry and all industries for each "invariably arise from the economic consequence of the" investment in terms of wages. " In other words, all workers have a share capital in each industry and each worker will have a share capital in all industries.
VI. "Management of Workers:
When an industry is direct ownership of all workers in the country industry management accordingly be entrusted in the hands of workers as a whole. Given that all workers can not participate in the management of a particular industry, industry management will be delivered to workers in the industry on behalf of all workers in the country. A group of elite management of workers in the industry, well-trained in the industrial and business management through business schools will deal with the industry. The elite management group is responsible to all workers in business and industry management group must maintain accountability and transparency in all industrial activities.
VII. Double income (salary plus dividends):
When each sick worker is a 'social capital' in all industries the country, the benefit to all industries that is the benefit or national dividend will be distributed to all workers. Thus, workers will dual income, wage income for their work and dividend income "for his contribution of the investment.
VIII. Society egalitarian
When all workers contribute a certain percentage of participation in investment income as the national investment income under wage, the "burden of investment 'low income group of workers will be greater than the burden of investment" high-income group of workers. For example, if low income group of people who contribute Rs. 1000 as the investment of their wage income of Rs.10, 000, the burden on investment greater than the high income group of people who contribute Rs.10, 000 as the investment of their earned income Rs.1, 00,000 as the low income group people have to sacrifice to consumer staples and energy saving is equal to zero at that wage income and the other hand the high income group people do not have to sacrifice consumption goods, but only to convert their savings into investment. Therefore, the low income group people have a higher "load investment 'for development of national economy after the high-income group of people. Then there is the economic justice that the "most dividends" should focus on low-income groups of people in high-income group of people on the basis of the "burden of investment." More investment means the load plus the dividend and less burden of the investment minus the dividend. This fair distribution of dividends will lead the economy towards an egalitarian society.
First Instead, the highest dividend received by the "low income group and the dividends received by the lowest" high-income group 'will reduce "income gap "Between the two income groups.
Second, in Democrism, the "concept of profit" will not be used as an instrument of exploitation of workers, but as a "mechanism" for the establishment of an egalitarian society in the world.
Now the basic economic concept to extend its domain as follows:
"Work according to energy
Salary according to job
Investment in accordance with the wages,
Benefit (Dividends) in accordance with the investment burden,
Equality according to the benefits (dividends) "
IX. Tax-free economy:
For proper functioning of the economy of the "National income is divided into segments such as 1. Income gain compensation, 2. Tax benefits compensation, 3 and producers' cash flow deficit of gain compensation.
income compensation earnings: It means that part of the national benefits that departs to distribute as a dividend under the burden of investment to cover the income gap between the group low-income and upper income groups for the establishment of an egalitarian society. As explained above.
Compensation Tax profit: It means a part of the national income to be directly assigned to the government to meet its expenses. This part of the national income is only income government which is so far obtained from direct and indirect taxes. All such taxes shall be abolished on the economy and the population will contribute directly part of their earnings to the national government for its expenses. There will be "tax-free economy in the country. In this way, an enormous amount of money spent for collection of taxes will disappear. Moreover, the corruption involves both tax collection and evasion of taxes will disappear.
"Deficit-entry Producers monetary compensation of benefits: economic stability: stability in employment levels, income from production industries on sale at all employment levels. If the industries are to achieve the expected revenue "from the sale of goods from one part of created national interest in the flow to industries to compensate for its deficiency of income expected to sustain the level of employment and production. Unemployment does not arise because of deficiency in effective demand is due to a failure of consumers to buy goods produced by them.
X. Maintaining the stability of the economy:
The fundamental factor underlying all economic systems is to keep the economic machine in good condition in perpetuity to ensure economic growth stable with the accelerated tempo especially required to eradicate poverty and unemployment. The smooth functioning of an economic machine requires "a perfect monetary equilibrium and sustained in the circular flow of money between producers and consumers. "The rate of flow of money (eg Rs.100 billion) from producers to consumers when the production of goods is in effect over a period of time must equal the rate of flow of money (the same Rs.100 billion) consumer to producers when the consumption of goods is in force at the same length of time. "
If consumers create a "gap" on their spending money income of Rs.100 million farmers will face a deficiency (eg Rs 10 billion) in revenue money required Rs 100 million dollars and that will force producers to reduce the volume of production by Rs 10 billion in the next round of production and employment levels accordingly. In order to end the "deficiency of Rs.10 billion in income of producers require Rs.100 billion" to keep economic activity in the next round, the third part of the "National ie, the benefits" deficit cash flow producer profit "will be used to fill the monetary gap of producers, although the goods are not sold. The goods may die, but not the lives of workers because to unemployment as is happening now in capitalism and socialism. If we put in terms Keynesian unemployment does not arise because of the lack of effective demand when the third portion of National-benefit is used properly.
In the democratization of the economy of the very concept of profit will be expelled from "Factor of worker exploitation, but operate as a recovering economic cross-workers (people) from the clutches of taxes, inequality economic and financial imbalance. In other words the concept of profit will be protected here as a "technical economics" to maintain stability in economic activities rather than an "operator"
XI. Prosumer Society:
For the democratization of an economy and, subsequently, in consequence of the principle of "investment in accordance with" wages, all consumers (workers) will become on producers. So the economic discrimination between consumers and producers will naturally disappear. A Producer cum consumer society, known as "prosumer" New society is emerging in the economy. In the prosumer society can be inferred that all consumers, naturally, will become the producers of products they want to produce. The people as a whole will determine what to produce, how to produce and how much to produce and you take the "risk factor" of production maintain economic stability.
XII. Fair price:
Given that all consumers can enjoy the position of producers in a prosumer society will only consumers to set a price for the products they want to consume. There will be fight of the demand and supply forces between producers and consumers in the pricing. It is consumers (producers) who set the price of the products they want to consume. There will be general satisfaction and consentaneous will among consumers in the pricing rather than competitive. It's the same price, because there is no place to feel ambiguous the price level is higher or lower.
It is the right price, because even if the fixed price is considered to be much higher than the cost of goods will be given a higher profit margin. Higher profit means wider distribution of dividends, the higher dividend income means higher dividends for consumers who are in the parenthesis of low income groups and media. What consumers pay more in the form of "price increased slightly 'will immediately be more than compensated in the form' of greater dividend income "An increase in the price level always tacitly helping consumers to fill their" income gap "rather than exploit them. The benefit will be created drained to consumers because they are the producers as well as in the "prosumer" society.
We have seen that there are 'income tax compensation in the domain of national benefits of the people. If the price level is reduced to the point where they only cover the "expenses of government, the people do not receive dividends to increase their income, along with earnings. The "profitable without price level", although it will be comparatively low, will not help the low income group people to harvest the benefit of the dividend income to increase their total income. So people tend to push up the price level to a point where the national benefit will be sufficient to give "greater dividend rate ', then the" marginal increase in the price level.
The increased volume of dividends that the 'marginal increase in the price level for low-income groups of people has been called "income" for them. We put the "income gain" in other words as "Income balancer." This will reduce the income gap between the group high and low income people as "Dividend is distributed according to the investment burden."
At a certain point on the curve the price level poor receive more dividends than the rich. Thus, the "balancer of revenue, some of the money transfers of income from rich to poor, little by little. This transfer monetary income gradually reduce the income gap between rich and poor and tend to achieve economic equality. Economic equality can not get a single stroke of lightning. The combined socio-economic circumstances should be taken into account. In the name of equality we should not crush and squeeze the rich. Universal harmony and consensus should prevail among the people in achieving equality.
There are several points on the curve of price level increase in the dividend rate will be higher than the "marginal price level" This point of the curve determines the price level "fair price" of the economy at a given level of production.
XIII. Free economy Inflation:
As a result of the democratization of the economy of the fair price is to act in concert without problems by increasing total income, with earned income and dividend payments increased. Since any increase in the price level increase total dividend payment of income, ie wages plus dividends, the poor will increase their purchasing power. In addition, the fair price is determined by consensus universal consumer only. So, if the price level increases, so increases to expand the profit margin and shall be effective to pay higher dividends – income for the poor. Therefore, any increase in the price level is increasing the purchasing power of poor people, but not lost.
Vicious inflation spiral prices and wages will not emerge in the democratization of the economy. There are no "market price" determined by the interaction of demand and supply forces, but only the "fair price" determined by the consumers themselves. Therefore the mode of operation of the economy will be "no inflation" of any kind.
XIV. The natural resource management:
The democratization of the economy is the people, only the people, have the utmost care and absolute control over the allocation and award of natural resources. Natural resources are not only very scarce, but also remain very source of all production and distribution of goods and services in any economy. The people will have sole control over natural resources and assume full freedom and authority in their allocation to the production and economic activities involving various government annulled in any way or form.
When natural resources under the direct control of the people who will not allow natural resources to produce goods destructive as nuclear weapons, who are now threatening the very existence of mankind and as dangerous goods as ganja, opium and other drugs that are harmful to human health. Today drugs are widely spreading its wings around the world, especially among young people, and represent a dangerous risk to the life of the people. Since it is the global network traffic and the strong nexus between politicians, executives and is marketed under the business world of drugs medications for ignoring the welfare cash benefits of society and not worrying about the health of future generations, the enforcement and execution of sentences appear to be ineffectual and powerless in the control and suppression the flowering of the date of hire during the day. The only solution now remaining end is the democratization of the economy and rely on natural resources in the hands of the people.
XV. Elimination of Nuclear Weapons:
If we look deeply to find the root cause the production of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, poisonous, it follows from the fact that it is the State, the State, with the ownership of capital, produce such weapons throughout the world in the name of "self defense" or "military balance" or enjoy the dignity of the "superpower." These weapons are produced by the State without the knowledge and approval of the people, even if the capital used for production of those weapons, is snatched from tax payments from people.
These keep guns around the world as "open battle" and kill millions of people innocent. The people who pay the tax for their own welfare are not aware of the conversion of capital into capital production destructive. They always stay in the most complete darkness.
The only solution for the people to save themselves from nuclear holocaust is the immediate implementation of democratization of the economy, ie "Property of the people straight equity. Because in the direct control of the capital people will not allow at any cost their capital and industries to produce" weapons of mass destruction, and thus destroy themselves.
No meetings at the summit on nuclear arms reduction, no bilateral or multilateral treaties on non-proliferation of nuclear technologies ensure world peace. I think the only hope for human survival and the extent to world peace anchored in the democratization of the economy apart from the solution of poverty and unemployment.
XVI. Elimination of Global Terrorism:
The Declaration, "A man's man is a terrorist fighter for the freedom of others, has become not only a cliché, but also one of the most difficult obstacles to deal with terrorism. The question of definition and conceptualization is usually a purely theoretical, but in the fight against terrorism, the problem of definition is a crucial element in the attempt to coordinate international collaboration.
The attempt to confuse the concepts of "terrorism" and "national liberation" are reflected in various official statements from the Arab world. For example, the V Islamic Summit in Kuwait in early 1987, stated in its decision that:
The conference to reiterate its absolute faith in the need to distinguish the brutal and unlawful terrorist activities perpetrated by individuals, groups, or states of the legitimate struggle of oppressed and subjugated nations against foreign occupation any kind. This fight is sanctioned by the celestial law, for human values and international conventions.
– (Al-Anba 'a Kuwait, January 30.1987)
The Declaration, "A terrorist is one other is a fighter for freedom" justifies the means "(terrorism) in terms of" last "(liberation national). Former Soviet President Leonid Brezvev, made the following statement in April 1981 during the visit of Libyan leader, Gaddafi Muana:
"The imperialists have without taking into account either by the people's will or the laws of history. The liberation struggles cause their indignation.'s Described as" terrorism "
– (Ray S. Cline and Yonah Alexander, "Terrorism as war Covent sponsored by the State"-Virginai Hero Books, 1986, p24).
It is impossible for any organization must be a terrorist group and a national liberation movement, at one time.
Senator Jackson was quoted in the book of Benyamin Netanyahu "Terrorism: How the West can win" (p 18) as saying:
"The idea that" terrorists of a person "is another" fighter for freedom can not be punished … It is unfortunate that democracies would allow the treasured word "freedom" to be associated with acts of terrorists "
Without answering the question "What is terrorism, no responsibility can be imposed on countries supporting terrorism, or take measures to combat terrorist organizations and their allies (see Resolution 1269). Without a definition of terrorism, it is impossible to formulate or enforce international agreements against terrorism.
Modern terrorism is becoming increasingly dependent on the support of nations. State sponsor terrorist organizations use terrorism as a means to purposes, as these organizations rely on the assistance they receive from these countries in the echo, military and operational. Some organizations are so closely dependent the assistance of States to become "puppets" functions to the initiative, leadership, and with the full support of these states. It is impossible to deal effectively with terrorism without breaking the close link between terrorist organizations and state sponsors. This tie, however, can not be separated without agreeing on a broad definition of terrorism, and therefore of States that sponsor and the measures to be taken against them.
The struggle to define terrorism is as difficult as the fight against terrorism itself. Under these circumstances, it seems difficult to reach consensus among the countries of the world in the definition of terrorism. Because every country wants to escape the clutches of the brand of state terrorism. In the absence of a consensus of the affected countries to bilateral agreements to combat terrorism when they know they will not help much in the fight against terrorism. Although "terrorism is the deliberate and systematic assault against the civilian population and civil servants to inspire fear for political purposes, "countries of the world hesitate to take strong and unanimous decision to eliminate terrorism for ulterior motives. If so, how can we eliminate terrorism as humanity really need it.
Terrorism is a terrorist of the theory and is an executor theory. A terrorist is a person, armed with destructive weapons, with the aim of killing innocent civilians in general to attract the immediate attention of a state or the world to accomplish its political goal, regardless of its value. A person can not become a terrorist until and unless it is equipped with deadly weapons and destructive. Today global terrorism is state sponsored or sponsored or underworld don like bin Laden. In both cases the terrorists from acquiring deadly weapons and ammunition, and long-range missiles and weapons and explosives, hazardous and toxic gases from the state government or vested interests. The world economy is such that its mode of production and distribution is random and is solely for profit so that terrorists can easily acquire destructive weapons to meet their political motivations. In the allocation of scarce natural resources for the production of destructive weapons, the profit motive of capitalists and the political motivation of terrorists are in coordination.
The weapons of destruction in the hands of evil people to induce them to fall into terrorism. If there are no weapons of terrorist activities. For example, the terrorists can not hijack planes with bare hands, with the intention of destroying the twin towers of World Trade Center in New York and terrorize everyone killing three thousand people in a stroke of lightning. In vehicles stopped in the flight of aircraft and luggage for weapons and ammunition and deadly explosives used to kill innocent people. We can not find the terrorists hands to meet their political ends. There is a perception among people that Saudi Arabia is the epicenter of global terrorism, where huge monetary resources are available in the name of the celestial law. Weapons and explosives are the basic element for terrorism.
The production of such deadly weapons can not be adequately controlled and can not be prevented from passing into the hands of terrorists in the capitalist mode of production whose sole purpose is profit motive, but not the welfare social. Before passing the epicenter of terrorism in Saudi Arabia to other parts of the democratic countries, we have to close all places and the mode of production and distribution destructive weapons. Even human suicide bombers can not become terrorists unless they are equipped with explosives. The capitalist mode of production is not effective keep capitalists under control with its own interests in the production and distribution of destructive weapons as required by terrorists. That the aim and the pattern of terrorism any design, the accessibility of destructive weapons by terrorists should be removed completely to eradicate terrorism in the world.
Only in the democratization of the town's economy as a whole would have absolute ownership of natural resources and control over the allocation of them to produce and distribution of such terrorist weapons. Individual consumers are served with consumer products only, no terrorist group or the State will ensure access to resources natural for the production and distribution of weapons that terrorists require. Before the democratization of the economy, the sooner world peace in the eradication of terrorism. If the opinions and views of people in this regard are clear and courageous, the result will be peace and prosperity
XVII. JUST A LAW: "The economic theoretical gap "
In my comprehensive assessment of the basic structural technique economic laws I can find a "gap economic life "among the current economic systems and complex textures to create confusion, ie, capitalism and communism, on the one hand and the well ordered and universally acceptable economic system we want to establish instead is, of course, very close and is able to fill. The establishment of well-ordered society is not very far beyond the blue horizon. It is only in our arms outstretched and in our hands. It only requires an enactment of one and only one "economic law basic "capital for the creation of" a share to a "person.
Economic gap and capitalism:
The term "economic vacuum" I mean the difference in "social capital owned" by an employer or a State, and the vast majority of people (workers). The measure of the breadth of the economic gap in an economy determines what a country's economic system carried out if capitalism and communism (socialism). When the magnitude of the economic gap in ownership of the share capital of a partnership between a person or family and vast majority of shareholders is very wide, the company is capitalist in nature. For example, when 51% or more than the capital of the company is owned one person (or usually a family) – joint owners of assets and 49% or less than that of the majority is owned by the waste of people – sharing liability holders for 10 or 20 shares at least from millions of shares, we can call the company and the capitalist type of organization. In no exact words Capitalism is more than autocratic. For example, the billgates (Microsoft) in the USA, Narayana Moorty (Infosys), Premji (Wipro) and Mukesh (dependence) in India, to name are few, the autocrats of capitalism. These autocrats distribute billions of dollars as a dividend to themselves and only a few dollars to the vast majority of shareholders in the number of share ownership. Active shareholders can exercise control over not only the capital, including the capital the vast majority, but also in management and decision – making the firm but the passive shareholders can only get an insufficient amount dividend income.
When capitalism collapsed during 1930 worldwide, economists and politicians wanted to inject a dose of "Democratic principles" in the creation of capital for the establishment of business. But they do not follow the "distributive justice", the very basis of democracy, the issue of shares for capital formation. With nefarious designs of policy makers to protect the vested interests have been banned equality in wealth and income to defend the "distributive justice" by allowing a person to buy as many shares as you can buy in the creation of capital. Although it is argued that democratic principles are followed in the establishment of business organizations through the distribution of shares to people. But in practice, even a single person can buy a large volume of shares and the vast majority of people who are left to the purchase of shares of only 10 or 20 of the billions of shares issued in public. This share ownership has created an economic divide and led to the rise of autocratic capitalism, once again on behalf of democratic principles.
In order to protect democratic principles and distributive justice in the creation and ownership of capital, some economists and unions in European countries and even in the U.S. have established "Capital Ownership Group (COG) to raise" investment funds "of workers to buy shares of the company you are working and the new shares are issued to the public. The major obstacle to private equity groups property now faces is the lack of government support and the inability to raise sufficient investment funds to buy the vast majority of the shares to take control of a company to inject "distributive justice" and to exercise democratic power in the management of a company. Therefore, it requires a new economic strategy and technique new economy not only for the creation of new capital, but also for the distribution of existing capital to workers only in line with democratic principles and distributive justice so that we can eliminate the economic gap between capitalists and workers.
With the firm intention to establish "Economic Democracy" to replace autocratic capitalism, some economists and trade unions in most countries Europe and even in the United States have organized (PROPERTY CAPITAL GROUP COG) to increase the "Investment Funds" of workers. The goal of COG is to use Investment Fund mainly to purchase the shares of the company where workers are working to inject a dose of democracy in the management and reduce economic gap between capitalists and workers by increasing dividend income of workers to maintain "distributive justice."
The COG face terrible obstacle is the lack of support from government and politicians to the cumulative "Investment Fund" of teeth as far as possible to reduce the economic gap. In addition, the COG can not fund more investment in order to compete with the capital wealth of a few capitalists. Following volume short of the actions of the workers are unable to protect their economic freedom, economic equality and economic security. So we have to dig a new strategy new economic and economic technique, which entitles workers to buy the same volume of shares than others to revitalize the "distributive justice" and "economic democracy." It requires a single enactment of a law as "an action to a person in the creation of capital for the establishment of new business organizations and divestments of capital to the workers on the same principle of "one share to one person."
Wealth gap and Communism: The Economic gap in ownership between the state capital in communism (or socialism) and the workers seems to be infinite. The State claims ownership absolute total share capital of the nation as a whole and the workers are denied any bit of direct ownership of capital, even in the organization are working. Under communism the capital is not created by issuing shares to the public so that no worker can buy any involvement. The capital is created from tax payment of workers. Workers refuse to enjoy the economic rights like the right to participate in the management and decision making, Right to Freedom Economic, Right to Economic Equality, Right to Economic Security, Right to choose a job of a worker is ready. The economic scenario is also important that prevails in the capitalist organization. Because both the system handles an enormous amount of capital of a capitalist in capitalism and the state under communism. The vast majority of workers are denied to possess an appropriate level of capital and justifiable to protect against invasion of their economic life.
Under communism, workers are allowed only for salary income on the basis of their work. The national capital is also created by the workers according to their work, but are not allowed to claim a share of capital in terms of their work. According to the work of not only workers producing goods and services but also the capital. But they can be reached only goods and services and not to claim any share in its capital. They are producing for the state capital and goods and services themselves. Therefore, the economic gap in ownership of capital between the state and workers as a whole is infinite and immeasurable. Measurement economic gap tends to zero at infinity.
In the current context of fierce competition between countries to boost its gross national product of communist counties Russia and China want to reduce their economic gap, by allowing their share of the capital of the State to be distributed among workers in the form of shares. They believe that if workers are a certain amount of capital that will work with enthusiasm and vigor to increase productivity and GDP. Instead of keeping the economic gap in the infinite communists now want the gap with a measurable value. They have now introduced privatization in one sector of production, especially in electronics. China has the ability to compete in the market world with cheap products, and electronic toys. The Communists slowly allows multi-national companies to establish their organizations in its territory. The change of scenery world economic is forcing the communists to reduce the economic gap between the state and considerable level workers. But how far will be reduced the difference? What is the need for their economy has to answer for their future generations.
Economic Systems Act:
In my discern factors that decide the economic systems which differ from one country to another, I hear the "wealth gap" plays a dominant role. If the "economic distance" between capitalists and workers is widening we dare say that the autocratic capitalist economic system or dictatorial. In the same track if the difference is at infinity and immeasurable between the state and workers, economic systems is nothing but dictatorial communism (Or socialism). And if the economic gap will be reduced between the capitalists or the State, on the one hand and workers on the other hand we can predict that the economic system the economy moves toward democracy. "applying some economic and technical strategy if the" wealth gap "is fully eliminated between capitalists or the state and workers, the economic system becomes "democratic, for the constitution of which we are fighting for years together.
Economic Gap and Democratic Economics:
With the fiery spirit of solving economic problems Economists now realize to create "an economy" instead of multiple economic systems. As far as I'm concerned, the establishment of "One Economy 'will solve the acute economic problems as unemployment, poverty, economic inequality, economic insecurity and political problems such as terrorism and nuclear holocaust to name a few.
The establishment of "One Economy 'requires the fusion of multiple economic systems including communism and capitalism in a way justifiable. I strongly advocate the only technique for combining communism and capitalism is the elimination of economic gap "between the employer (capitalist or the State) and employee (working class). On the elimination of the" wealth gap " the distinction between employer and employee will disappear and all the workers become shareholders and all shareholders will become workers. This will pave the way for the emergence of "Economic Democracy". The Democratic economy satisfies all the conditions for creating "One Economy" that economists need to.
On the other hand in the abolition of the capitalists (entrepreneurs) a society without classes emerge and workers will be emancipated from the clutches of the arrogance of capital from the capitalists and the state for use. I discuss the matter further in detail. Now my main concern is to discuss with you how to establish "democratic economy." Law is required by law, as a law in the constitution. The law requires the creation of capital by way of distribution of shares, the shares to be allotted on the principle of "justice distributive Equality. "This means that the shares to be awarded the democratic principle of" one share of a person. To uphold the principle of equality of all workers would be assigned the same number of shares without discrimination on grounds of social status, income and occupational position.
About the Author
Director, International Socio-Economic Research Bureau, India
Christmas 2008 Marx Toy Train Layout
Related Blogs
Tags: lionel, marx toy trains, marx toy trains for sale, model, stock, train, trains
Leave a Reply